Students, technology and literacy

Students tend to be up-to-date with technology, and increasingly own an expensive range of personal items such as MP3 players, iPods, laptops and widescreen televisions according to a BBC News report last year. This is of course the whole thing about education and teachers – keeping up with the intuititive adoption of technology that earmarks the modern learning.

It begs the question – just how are young people are engaging with digital media – especially when it has not been designed to be explicitly educational. What are they learning in terms of skills, networking and collaboration? The way our students are using technology outside school is changing, and so are the ways they learn. Ultimately schools will need to respond to such ‘informal’ learning with digital media, games consoles, the internet and mobile phones.

The BBC news report March 2006 Experts seek 2020 vision, explains the focus of personalised learning for this ‘expert group’ investigation. The summary of their review charter looks like a brief that any education system can apply to their vision and thinking right now……

  • teaching and learning strategies, especially in literacy and numeracy
  • best use of setting and grouping
  • improving parental engagement
  • how personalised learning can close the achievement gap and boost social mobility
  • addressing the needs of gifted and talented children
  • use of ICT and pupil data to personalise learning
  • the potential for workforce reform to support personalisation
  • utilising flexibilities in the National Curriculum
  • collaboration between schools to deliver educational opportunities.

I find this brief curious and interesting for the possible connections – which I hope these ‘experts’ will make.

Literacy is of course a burning issue for humanity – and has always been so. It is important not to let this priority be swamped by the emerging trends in technology and social networking tools and gadgets.

Tom Peters in his ALA TechSource blog wrote a few posts recently that can be juxtaposed quite nicely in order to inform our thinking re 2020 vision:

Peter wrote:

” I think everyone agrees that reading words printed on paper, in solitude (even though there may be others around us, as in a library or on a subway), and in silence is currently the dominant reading mode. We can call this “PSS” reading: paper, solitude, silence. When youngsters first learn how to read, often they read out loud, even when they are alone, but they quickly learn that reading in silence is more socially acceptable, easier, and quicker.”

PPS reading has been the dominant mode of reading for the last several centuries.

Yes, and now things are changing, and digital media of various kinds are moving in on the reading ‘literacy’ scene. We need to recognise and work with these developments, moving beyond the discussions of the turn of the century years which focussed on ‘visual literacy’ and ‘digital literacy’. We must focus on literacy in various forms and in various access points. PPS reading is not the only true or exalted form of reading. But PPS reading still a core skill or technique – for the time being anyway.

Peter wrote:

” Our collective historical consciousness probably will come to realize and accept that, although the ascendancy and dominance of PSS reading was an historical fact that cannot be denied, there is nothing inherent in reading on paper that ipso facto makes that act superior to all other modes of reading.”

Switch now to PP ICE devices!!

Peter says

” The new age I see dawning is the age of the personal, portable information / communication / entertainment device. Granted, that’s a long gray name for a bright new age, but if you vocalize the acronym—PP ICE Device—it has certain melodious qualities.”

I agree with him – we DO need to take the device era seriously, because these devices, coupled with our technology access, mark (highlight?) our slide/transition into a new global era – which will become as radically different to what what before as the shift in society after the Gutenberg press.

We knew it was coming…Al Rogers and Marshal McLuhen were heralding the changes late last century. But now we can see the shape it is taking with the emergence of Web 2.0 technologies and social networking tools and structures. This was not understood or predicted.

The 20th century canvas painted with broad brush strokes is now being refined and defined with images of PP ICE devices!!

Reading and Literacy

June 21 and I fly out of Australia heading for the School Library Assocation and their annual weekend conference being held this year at the University of Bath, UK, from Fri 23 – Sun 25 June. The program is entitled “If You’ve Got It, Flaunt It — Promoting School Libraries”.

Part of the SLA vision states “We believe that every pupil is entitled to effective school library provision”. I will be presenting two seminars on the topic:

“Learn to read, learn to succeed: developing literacy with Accelerated Reader”. The handout notes of the presentation are in the Resources link in this blog. The full presenation has lots of pictures that showed the kids in action – totally engrossed and loving the experience of reading!

The central premise of my presentation is that this particular program, unlike any other that I have come across, when used well, makes Library central to literacy and learning, above any other approach. No seperate reading program, no graded readers that sit in seperate boxes, no colour coding, nothing that creates a stigma. I hope to be able to share some of the experiences of teachers and librarians in Australian schools, and so help my British colleagues work out how best to use the program in their own schools.

The next port of call will be Lisbon, Portugal, 3-7th July for the annual conference of the International Assocation of School Librarianship. The theme of the conference this year is the Multiple Faces of Literacy. No presentation this time, as I will be involved with organisational things in my role as Vice President (Association Relations).

Library 2.0 and Books of the World

Due to the google-ification of the world's collection of books, we are going to find ourselves in a very different space in terms of books and reading some time in the not so distant future. No, I don't advocate getting rid of books – there is something very portable, tactile, personal and relevant about an actual copy of a book. But we do need to think beyond book too.

Changes in the book-landscape come together in a series of recent posts and messages that are related to books.

Will Richardson's post about his book Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms (love that book!) is worth reading just to see what he is cogitating. What will he do about his next book?

Then we have Michael Stephen's message about the iPod program at St Joseph County Public Library.

" The library will begin offering downloadable audiobooks on iPods beginning Fall 2006! Bring in your own iPod or check out one of the library-owned iPods. We’ll download bestselling audiobook titles from the iTunes Music Store for use on your MP3 player, laptop, or in your car."

Last but not least from InfoBlog we have Michael Cart talking about the future of books. The 15-minute podcast looks at the New York Times Magazine article from May 14 entitled, "What Will Happen to Books?"

His unique perspective as an author and librarian brings an even-handed perspective to the controversy surrounding the "google-ification" of books and what impact this may (will) have on our current ideas of intellectual property.

Some food for thought!

Working the Web – using or abusing?

I spent a good part of today attending a professional development session for Teacher Librarians. Amongst the things discussed was ethical use of resources and the issues around plagiarism.

In this context I am wonder where developments in Web 2.0 software will take us. Joe reports on Clipmarks. is a website which enables you to clip images and text onto a website to store and, optionally, share. Just like how you can take magazine and newspaper clippings, Clipmarks allows you to do this on websites.

Clipmarks requires you to install a extension or an toolbar. Say you are researching a specific topic and you have multiple sites open, each with a snippet of text or an image you want to take note of. With Clipmarks, you can simply open each source in a new tab in your browser, go into clip mode (first icon in toolbar), and clip multiple objects from each site. You will find all of your clippings still intact in each tab/site. Then, when saving your clippings, you will see that the Clipmark page will include all clippings grouped by source on one page. I have found this very useful, especially for when researching.

The idea behind Clipmarks isn’t just to store things – it’s to share them. is a bookmarking service designed for storing and sharing bookmarks. However, on del.icio.us you do not have the option to keep these bookmarks private. Clipmark is a bookmarking site with a twist.

Well yes! As Joe says "When does Clipmarks become a copyright breach? Copying copyrighted images and text (in quantities larger than an excerpt) surely isn’t fair use."

Solution Watch offers this information:

"Say you are researching a specific topic and you have multiple sites open, each with a snippet of text or an image you want to take note of. With Clipmarks, you can simply open each source in a new tab in your browser, go into clip mode (first icon in toolbar), and clip multiple objects from each site. You will find all of your clippings still intact in each tab/site. Then, when saving your clippings, you will see that the Clipmark page will include all clippings grouped by source on one page. This could be very useful, especially for when researching".

Read the full report from SolutionWatch here. Lets see what happens!

Big Questions on Information Literacy

To follow up on my post about literacy, I am also inspired by Ewan's post on information literacy.

" What needs to change when our students can publish to a worldwide audience?

How does a teacher's role change when we can bring primary sources into the classroom?

How do we define literacy in a world where we must not only know how to read and write but to edit and create and publish?

Some answers.. Teachers need to be…

Content creators
Collaborators
Mentors to critical thinking
Change agents"

I would suggest that teachers also need to be…..

Mentors for developing a love of reading
Personal tutors encouraging a "PB" approach
Promotors of creativity

Big questions on literacy

A visit to several different schools today led me to conclude that literacy remains critical, central, and pivotal in the life experience of our students, regardless of the technology that they use either at school or in their social on-line world. We still need to find ways of promoting reading for pleasure, and metacogntivie involvment with what is happening in the book.

Teachers are always concerned about the literacy development of their students, but can seem to me to be remarkably unconcerned about the actual need to help foster an interest in reading. The problem is that teachers do not differentiate between literacy acquisition (as well as remediation) and literacy development. Students need to engage with a wide range of texts, not only for a purpose (learning) but also for fun!

I have seen great succes in promoting reading using a program called Accelerated Reader marketed by Renaissance Learning. It has a nice use of technology as a quizz tool. Yes I know that sometimes this program doesn't work at all!! But I am convinced that this is the result of poor implemetation, and poor engagement of the teachers in providing individual support for each student's emerging or developing literacy.

I was greatly heartened by one message, that appreared recently on the listserv for teacher librarians in Australia, about experiences with Accelerated Reader. For some the vote is still out on whether or not the program is worth including in the school curriculum.

" We have been using Accelerated Reader for the last 4 years and we absolutely love the program and the results we are seeing everyday! I have Junior School teachers who can see the benefits so clearly with their student's, they are now willingly giving up their RFF time each week to work with me on the program! I am definitely not a rep for AR, just an ordinary TL who gets soooo excited when I see kids reading! Throughout the use of the program we have seen the student's attitude to reading change – they now read the books they borrow, they now love reading, they plonk themselves all over the library to read. They reading in their lines, in their classrooms, they even read eating lunch and walking through the playground! They are excited about books!

We are a co-edschool and the boys in Year 3-6 are now reading as much as the girls. After years of trying to teach them how to use the catalogue they are now independent users because they need to locate their books on a regular basis. Teachers working with me on AR in the library find they are totally involved in their student's literature program, they receive regular, helpful and comprehensive reports on all students and are able to closely monitor their student's progress with me. Students love the freedom of choosing their own books and doing the quizzes but they definitely need to have read the book. In my experience they cannot score highly on their quiz by just watching the movie or reading the blurb! We have our AR books integrated throughout the collection and their student levels are zones of proximal development where maximum learning takes place with minimal frustration. We are trying to move right away from the reading scheme mentality. Over the past few years we have surveyed the students, parents and teachers and have shared ideas with each other on how we can improve its implementation. Every school is different and I agree with Judy, it may not work for everyone. I do believe however, the key to its success is the way it is implemented. We have found our students are more confident when reading and their vocabulary, comprehension and literacy skills have improved. Our students read widely now and across genres. AR inspires them to share their reading experiences with their classmates and read other booksthat are not on the program! Our more capable students have been extended and challenged and our slower ones encouraged through success.This …is the day-to-day nitty gritty classroom/library/student/teacher real evidence – for us the AR program WORKS!!!"